Ooh, let's talk about Chase & Chloe shoes #Wedding Shoes#pink shoes Updated Oct 31 2019 (Posted Mar 11 2016) Offbeat Editors This post features offbeat affiliates, meaning that if you buy something featured, you'll be financially supporting this site's mission of bringing awesomeness to readers everywhere. This is another one of those shoe posts where I get sniffing into one particular brand of shoes. Chase & Chloe pulled me in this time with the vintage-flavored styles — lots of T-straps, teardrop cut-outs, scalloped edges, and super mega affordability with all these styles coming in under $50. Let's take a peek-see, shall we? Related Post Care Bears, cupcakes, and skulls: Sweet and wild wedding flats from Iron Fist One way to ensure a little more comfort in your tootsies on the wedding day? WEDDING FLATS. But you're not resigned to boring styles when... Read more Random bonus weird thing you can register for: (Pro tip: set up a universal registry on Amazon to immediately add weird shit like this to YOUR registry.) Setup your wedding registry today PREVIOUS 6 tricks for personalizing your vows for maximum belly laughs and soggy hankies NEXT Cads About Matrimony: The wedding game that doesn't suck! Show/Hide comments [ 2 ] *scroll* Oh my gosh *scroll* Oh my gosh!! *scroll* OH MY GOSH!! I have so many wants right now. Reply those cat shoes speak to me Reply Join the conversation Cancel Reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Sign me up for your offbeat awesomeness newsletter! No-drama comment policy Part of what makes the Offbeat Empire different is our commitment to civil, constructive commenting. Make sure you're familiar with our no-drama comment policy. Biz owners & wedding bloggers Please just use your real name in your comment, not your business name or blog title. Our comments are not the place to pimp your website. If you want to promote your stuff on Offbeat Bride, join us as an advertiser instead.