10 ways to show your support of marriage equality at your wedding #Advice#charities#gay#LGBTQ#marriage equality May 16 | Megan Finley Horowitz meggyfin Rainbow Pride Hearts Party Pack of Temporary Tattoos Secret rainbow wedding cake from Tribe member Lila. Are you looking for a way to acknowledge your support for our LGBT friends and families during your hetero wedding ceremony? From the covert to overt, here are 10 ways to use your wedding to show your support for marriage equality. 1. Use gender neutral terms in your ceremony. This is a great way to sort of sneak in your support, and even the most conservative of guests can't take offense. 2. Represent the rainbow. Rainbow flags are the symbol of LGBT pride and they're also pretty. Add some rainbow elements to your wedding as a way let your gay pride flag fly, as it were. 3. Add a moment of silence for those who can't marry. A silent "pouring one out for the homies" if you will. 4. Use your straight marriage certificate to make a point about gay marriage. This is a great way to use your paperwork to voice your opinion to the governmental powers-that-be. 5. Add a reading to your ceremony. Sarah and Adam worked with their officiant to include marriage equality in their ceremony by reading this passage from the 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision to legalize same-sex marriage: Related Post This wedding is super gay! 5 ways to make your wedding gay as hell It's Pride Month, y'all, and everyone should be giving props to the LGBTQ community and their weddings. Well, not everyone. Some folks have concerns about... Read more Marriage is a vital social institution. The exclusive commitment of two individuals to each other nurtures love and mutual support. Civil marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment to another human being and a highly public celebration of the ideals of mutuality, companionship, intimacy, fidelity, and family. Because it fulfils yearnings for security, safe haven, and connection that express our common humanity, civil marriage is an esteemed institution and the decision whether and whom to marry is among life's momentous acts of self-definition. It is undoubtedly for these concrete reasons, as well as for its intimately personal significance, that civil marriage has long been termed a "civil right." Without the right to choose to marry one is excluded from the full range of human experience. 6. Use marriage equality stickers as favors. Jill and Kim bought marriage equality stickers for their reception tables. Since those specific stickers are now out of print, I found a few good ones on Amazon here and here. 7. Include a link on your wedsite to a marriage equality charity. Some suggestions: MarriageEquality.org, Lamda Legal, Freedom to Marry. Or perhaps look for a charity that is fighting for the rights to gay marriage in your particular state. 8. Encourage charitable donations in lieu of presents. Use the suggestions from the above tip, or chose your own charities, and then ask your guests to donate in honor of you two, instead of gifting you a blender. Tribe member Channamasala's White Knot table. 9. Make a donation to a marriage equality charity and make reference to said donation in your program. 10. Have a WhiteKnot.org table set up. The White Knot is a marriage equality organization whose slogan is that everyone should have the right to tie the knot, and their symbol is, appropriately, a white knot. You could put out a little table with white knot ribbons, and a sign about your commitment to marriage equality with info about the White Knot organization. You and your partner could wear a white knot during the festivities, and you could make them available to guests to wear. I know there are even more creative and wonderful ways to show your support of marriage equality. How are you using your wedding to show your support? Get your daily dose of Offbeat AWESOME Reporter Name * Reporter Email * Original text Enter the original text here. Edited text* Enter your suggested copyedit here. Notes You can add a note for the editor here. * Required information. Fix Typo Megan Finley Horowitz When Megan’s not writing, traveling, and sleeping, she’s eating like the fate of the world depends on it. (You’re welcome, world!) You can snoop into her personal life over on her website The Dash and Dine! @meggyfin @thedashanddine @meggyfin PREVIOUS Witness: Grand entrances! Death defying feats! And child's play! NEXT Chantel & Mike's DIY Asian-inspired love-bird wedding Show/Hide comments [ 70 ] We out and out refused to have an officiant who WOULDN'T do a queer wedding (which is still surprisingly alot of officiants in Canada)and we made sure EVERYBODY coming knows that that was important to us. and we are having a reading that emphasizes the many shapes and forms love takes, be it man man, man woman woman man, genderqueer and smorgasborg of love WHATEVER. We our queer friends will be loud and proud at the wedding so I feel like everyone will know that this is an inclusive event without making a huge issue of it, which ends up being a kind of backwards prejudice "look how awesome we are for including YOU…" sort of thing. I think just making the wedding about the WHOLE community makes it inclusive that way. That and I am pretty sure a few of the guests may be showing up in drag ðŸ™‚ 18 agree Reply You are awesome & your significant other are awesome. 5 agree Reply I know of a wedding where instead of people clinking their glasses to get the bride and groom to kiss, they had to drop money into a donation jar that would later go to a marriage equality charity. I thought that was a great way to work a good deed into your wedding, whatever your choice of charity may be. 15 agree Reply We are working with our budget to see if we have the funds and the time to travel to OFFICIALY wed in a state that allows gay marriage, as opposed to legally marrying in ours, which doesn't. We definitely don't want to give our fee – as nominal as it is – to a state that doesn't support marriage equality and, sometimes, money is the only language that lawmakers speak. ðŸ˜› 37 agree Reply This x 100. We are getting married in 2 weeks in NC. Since the new legislation, we plan to get our license from Illinois,which supports marriage equality. Unfortunately, it's too late to back the whole wedding out of NC 1 agrees Reply We plan to wed in Indiana because it's a more equal distance for our families (I have family in Ohio and Michigan, he has family in Kentucky, Wisconsin and Illinois). I called the Circuit Court about wedding in Indiana but being Illinois residents and she told me we HAVE to get our license in whichever state we wed in. Is there a way we could still get our license from Illinois? 1 agrees Reply You could just have a small civil ceremony at the courthouse in Illinois. That would also allow you to have an un-official officiant (such as a close friend) at your main ceremony if you would like. 1 agrees Reply You need to get the marriage license in the same state (and sometimes the same county) where you will wed. Reply This is a great post, and something I've been thinking about a lot. I'm inspired, and I'm actually going to order equality stickers from the Human Rights Campaign. Donate $25 to a great cause, and get 50 stickers to put out at my reception. It's a win-win! HRC Action Center 4 agree Reply Are you willing to consider a different organization? HRC has a pretty tepid, milquetoast reputation; if someone wanted to support me, I'd rather they donate to Lambda Legal (which brought the case in Iowa) or even PFLAG. 13 agree Reply I have to back up NH. HRC is a loud voice, but is historically one of the LEAST efficacious gay rights groups out there. (Their response to Obama's refusal to repeal DOMA was essentially "Don't worry, someday something will get better! Let's just wait and see.") Lambda Legal is great for marriage equality, and there are dozens of other general LGBT advocacy groups out there. Dan Savage often recommends donating to Lambda Legal, and I usually trust his judgement on these things. 5 agree Reply Another voice recommending against HRC. In addition to the reasons given by Ellerie and NH, HRC doesn't have a good track record when it comes to being inclusive of the transgender community. Actually, I haven't been impressed by much of their work when it comes to issues affecting anyone other than white affluent gay men (and lesbians, to a lesser degree). 4 agree Reply Interesting….I never knew HRC was so frowned upon. I guess its like PETA… I'm a huge animal nut but detest PETA for the same reasons why people seem to detest HRC…..doesnt actually do any good for the cause they claim to be helping and just do a lot of hypocritical actions. Shame how some of the biggest names out there are the worst names :-/ 8 agree This is wonderful. I had already decided instead of (or possibly along with a regular present-type) favors to make a charitable contribution to support marriage equality for each guest. This is so important to me and my fiance. Thanks for all the great ideas! 2 agree Reply White Knot for the win! We had a white knot station set up with a sign and our guests really showed their support. It was nice because some of my family is not in support of marriage equality and we didn't want to make people feel uncomfortable but we still wanted to say something about how unfair it is, so this was perfect. Those that wanted to show support could but it didn't put other people on the spot or use our ceremony as a statement (which is sometimes great it just wasn't for us). This was our subtle classy way of sticking it to the "man" ðŸ™‚ Some of our friends still wear their white knots on their bags! 6 agree Reply We got legally married in a jurisdiction that promotes marriage equality. We did this on a different day than our wedding, and had a note in the program about why we weren't getting legally married that day. 11 agree Reply anon, that's BRILLIANT. We could make a solo drive to a state that DOES allow same sex marriages, get hitched, then have our "hoop de doo" for family and friends and let em know why we did it this way. Love it. 5 agree Reply I have to admit I'm always kind of wary of things like this, I feel like there's a fine line between showing your own support for a cause and using your wedding as a platform to preach your views to others when they're effectively a captive audience and can't share their own views in return. But I really like some of these ideas because they get the point across, but in subtle, non-forceful ways. 11 agree Reply I actually live in a place where gay marriage is legal (Toronto, Canada), and there will be about 5 or 6 gay people at my wedding. I do see what you are saying – I didn't want to use my wedding day to preach to people. However, because of our stance on this issue, and for other reasons too, we decided against a church wedding and we are getting married in a park. And one of the things that attracted me to our officiant was that she specifically stated in her ad that she does marry gay people. I really wanted to be married by someone who wouldn't deny other people the same kind of privilege my guy and I will have when we get married. 5 agree Reply I hear you, I don't usually expect to go to a wedding to be preached at. That being said I have been to more than one church wedding where the minister launched into a whole big tirade against both gay marriage and feminism, seemingly out of the blue, it was very strange. I was lucky I wasn't wearing a hat or I am sure it would have blown off, but no one else seemed to notice it was happening so maybe people wouldn't notice/be offended by a small speech in support of marriage equity if it was done in a friendly, non-judgey way? 1 agrees Reply I know you mean well by this, and I'm sorry to be a downer, but I have to say that as a lesbian, if I went to a straight wedding where any of this happened I would just feel patronised. If you get married, whatever else you're doing, you're still supporting and buying into the good old traditional institution of marriage between a man and woman, and there's nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't help our equality, it doesn't make a stand against anything. I'd be angry if any of my friends thought it did. If you're straight and enjoying the rights and privileges that you've had for centuries, to stand there and make a nod towards us and our inequality feel hypocritical. If you feel THAT strongly about it, don't get married until everyone is allowed to do it. It's great if you want to get out and campaign and protest with us at other times, but my personal view is leave it out of your actual wedding day. I know others won't agree, I'm just giving the view of one gay person. 48 agree Reply For me, I think it makes me feel honored (in a weird way) when people recognize that the inequality exists. Among the friends I have who might actually do some of the ideas, personally I would take it as a sweet reminder on their part that they are aware of and sad about the inequality. But again, that's just me. 20 agree Reply I can totally appreciate how things like this can feel (and be!) tokenizing. I had never really considered how I felt about straight folks doing 'nods' towards marriage equality until recently. For example, when my brother got married three years ago, it didn't even cross my mind. However, in the last few years, I've felt differently. I have officiated three straight weddings since then (I identify as queer and am a woman in a relationship with another woman right now) and found that, in each case, in the period where the couples (my BFF from high school, my cousin, and an aquaintance) were deciding what to do/if they should do anything, I had *really* strong feelings about wanting some level of recognition for my 'people.' My cousin and his wife decided not to put anything in, and I was incredibly hurt – but kept my mouth shut to keep the focus on them, instead of me. I suppose maybe this is about invisibility for me – and maybe for other LGBTQ folks. I already feel like my partner gets assumed to be my friend, that when (as happened yesterday) our wedding/celebration comes up, people go looking for my 'fiancee' and get confused when the number of girls and boys doesn't match up – so I want some level of recognition. I guess perhaps – like all things – it comes down to non-marginalized folks treading lightly, and with respect and humility and knowing that a diversity of tactics is always the way to go! <3, al 13 agree Reply I totally see where you're coming from, but it's not always practical for people not to get legally married – I had friends get married recently who were moving out of the country and needed the marriage license so they could get a visa. In that situation, what's the point of skipping the party, which is the part I can choose to have too? Yeah it's irritating that I don't have that option, but I don't want to deny it to them. Meanwhile, I really appreciated their acknowledgement (they asked for donations rather than gifts, and one of the organizations they suggested was one of the queer marriage groups) that it's not an option everyone has, and that they'd like to speed the day when we can all have legal backing for immigrating to our partners' homes. 8 agree Reply It may not be "practical" for people in some situations not to get married — but that's kinda the point. How do you think LGBT couples who need visas feel? 8 agree Reply I'm pretty sure I can imagine quite clearly, as I'm in a same-sex relationship myself. Here's the thing: I don't have any particular need for my straight friends to suffer unless it's going to do something actually useful for me. Advocating for equality at the wedding might be awkward for people with conservative families – damn skippy I want my straight friends to deal with that awkwardness, since it helps those conservative family members see it as normal. But I don't really benefit from my friends refusing to get married. I'd rather they put whatever energy they have into active support. 38 agree Reply Yeah. Unfortunately, heterosexual couples not getting married doesn't *hurt* the legislators who are standing in the way of equal rights, so as a protest (particularly one which often goes without being voiced to the legislators who need the boot upside the head) it doesn't have much effect. I like the idea of the letter to the judge along with the marriage certificate. I think I'll be doing something like that myself, when the time comes, along with making a donation to Lambda Legal. 4 agree I don't think any straight person/couple can imagine what it feels like for LGBT couples not to be able to obtain visas. I am in a situation where my fiance and I have to get married to be together (he is English). We've been apart for 3.5 years and finally are planning a wedding. My heart breaks for couples in our situation who are denied the same right. I have really struggled with this, because I always said I would never get married until legally my LGBT friends and fam could, and then I met my fiance. All I can say in my defense is I will always fight for the rights of my LGBT friends and family, and support them just like they support me in my decision to be with the man I love. 7 agree Reply Ditto this. As a lesbian, shows of "support" for marriage equality at straight weddings send this message to me: "we're thoughtful enough people to realize that the current legal system of marriage is discriminatory and unfair, but we're buying into it anyway! Enjoy the cake!" I don't appreciate the gesture at all, since the gesture is usually being made by people who recognize their privilege but are further legitimizing the system that gives them the privilege in the first place. I have nothing but respect for straight couples who chose not to legally marry as a form of protest, but very little for the type of thing discussed in the post. I know people are acting with good intentions but to me it only ends up being hurtful. 12 agree Reply I can understand not wanting a pittance, but what good does straight folks not getting married do? From this perspective, I think perhaps we should be advocating for a marriageless society – where no relationship is given legal or cultural advantages. And let me be clear, that would mean no civil unions, no domestic partnerships, no relationship acknowledgement. Until we're ready to get that radical, I think saying that straight folks who chose to get married but also give money/time/energy to queer causes aren't really allies feels dismissive of their relationships. 37 agree Reply Hubs and I feel that all marriages should be "reduced" to domestic partnerships, which are strictly legal. Anyone can get a domestic partnership with their partner which will afford them all of the legal benefits. If someone wants to get "married" they do so in a church. This would save the silly religious fanatics the heartburn of "marriage is between a man and a woman" and everyone is afforded the basic human right of a domestic partnership to their lover, no matter the gender. What happened to the separation of church and state? Separate them and allow people to love each other! 12 agree Reply I'm bisexual and marrying a man next March. We're planning to honor marriage equality and the lgbtq community precisely BECAUSE I am part of that community. Just bc a couple is man/woman doesn't mean that they're straight or that they're not part of the lgbtq community. Please stop making that assumption. 14 agree Reply I have to say that, while I understand the point you make, I find this sort of response to be rather negative, perhaps even ungrateful sounding. When LGBTQ people are facing the various sorts of prejudice (not just the inability to have their relationships legally recognised), that they are, I would feel that it is important for everyone, of whatever sexual orientation, to be involved in fighting those prejudices, in whichever small way they can. If a heterosexual couple want to get married, but also want to make any sort of gesture in support of equality (whether it be something overt like the white knot idea, or something more subtle, like checking their officiant would support gay weddings), I think that should be something to be celebrated. I do not think you can expect heterosexual couples to completely give up on the institution of marriage in order to make a stand on an issue which may well not directly concern them. As others have said, there are many reasons why people may wish to marry, and they should not be condemned as patronizing when they seek to do whichever gesture they may choose for the benefit of the LGBTQ community. Indeed, thay should be applauded for choosing to make that gesture at all, when there are so few who would dare to do so. Every little helps, am I right? 21 agree Reply Every little doesn't help. Some of the gestures in this post are genuinely helpful, such as writing to the judge, donating to gay rights organisations, etc. Many of them are not. Including a shout out in your ceremony? Having a rainbow theme? How does that do anything other than make a liberal-minded straight couple feel better about themselves? LGBTQ people don't owe straight people gratitude for making meaningless gestures about how they kind of sort of think we're human too. 7 agree Reply I don't think we should be grateful to straight people for doing the absolute bare minimum and then congratulating themselves on it. 8 agree Reply I think you're making some unfair assumptions here. First of all, some of the people acknowledging marriage equality at their hetero weddings might not identify as hetero. For instance, I identify as bisexual/queer but happen to be marrying a man. Marriage equality very easily could have been deeply personally relevant to me if my relationship had gotten more serious with one of my ex-girlfriends instead of one of my male partners. Additionally, I have very close family and friends that are affected by institutionalized anti-gay discrimination. Clearly, I have a significant amount of straight privilege (and I get that) but their situation impacts me directly. I've never had cancer but I feel pretty comfortable advocating for and raising awareness and money for cancer charities. I don't think that is pandering or patronizing to my friends and family that have fought the illness, it honors them. Finally, your argument that the only way to show dissatisfaction for the current institution of marriage is to not get married seems really peculiar. Aren't people that make an effort to subvert that institution by acknowledging and embracing equality in their celebrations acting to subvert it as well? I honestly think that this is a place where allies can make a difference and stand up for what is right. 33 agree Reply Well said! I am in a similar situation and am considering a reading from Chasing Amy as done in this wedding: http://offbeatbride.com/2012/08/portland-burner-wedding just to emphasize the point. I am also considering choosing a venue in one of the nearby states that recognizes civil unions or gay marriage. Whiteknot will definitely be a presence, either way. 1 agrees Reply Isn't Chasing Amy widely considered an effectively homophobic movie, since it's based on Kevin Smith's fantasy that the lesbian he was into wasn't REALLY a lesbian? 6 agree Reply Please for the love of god do not read that monologue at your straight wedding. That movie is incredibly homophobic and creepy, and using it to go on about how you ~just happen~ to be marrying a dude and thus obtaining an entire world of privileges that gay people are completely denied is incredibly self-centred and rude. 4 agree Reply Elyn, I agree with much of what you're saying, but the cancer analogy doesn't work here. 1) Cancer is not pure social injustice, but rather a disease that everyone agrees needs curing. 2) No one's saying that straight people shouldn't advocate for, raise money for, and raise awareness of marriage equality. 2 agree Reply I, along with my Fiancee, sent a personal invitation to my cousin's partner. This will be their first appearance in around family. They're both excited about coming to our wedding. 2 agree Reply My friends who got married over the weekend had a rainbow color scheme for this reason! Each of the bridesmaids had a dress in one of the colors of the rainbow, and the groomsmen had pocket squares to match. The bride's roses were tie-dyed! 4 agree Reply My Fiance and I have chosen to have a Civil Union instead of marriage. Although it is great that our country (New Zealand) has a legal union available to all peoples and gender, we wanted to take part in a union that is for EVERYBODY, not just heterosexual couples. Some of our friends have found this an odd decision, but a lot think it is great! 10 agree Reply In Aus, all celebrants have to read this thing called a 'monitum', which pretty explicitly states that marriage is between a man and a woman (I think the line is '…to the exclusion of all others…'). It makes me cringe every time I hear it, so we had a reading (which, coincidentally, I 'borrowed' from lila, owner of the rainbow cake above) that, amongst other things, showed our support for marriage equality. Something along the lines of 'Piper and Sam appreciate that they are fortunate to have the freedom to marry, and acknowledge that not all have this freedom. They hope for the day that state removes itself from church and embraces marriage for all…' 8 agree Reply We convinced our celebrant not to say the monitum! It was awesome ðŸ˜€ 6 agree Reply wow. brave celebrant they can lose their license for that 3 agree Reply i am not fond of the monitum but think we might have to wait a while julia is atheist and wont do it. but i guess she isn't that keen to marry herself? 2 agree Reply These are all great ideas! We are doing the gender neutral terminology during our ceremony, a reading about love knowing no race religion or gender, and possibly a moment of silence for those who are still fighting for their right to marry their true loves. This is very important for me to incorporate into my ceremony being as I am bisexual, and we have friends and family who are in committed same sex relationships. 3 agree Reply Could you post that reading? 2 agree Reply Hold hope guys, NZ was the first country to give women the vote and then the US followed, we allow all sex civil unions and marriages so you guys can't be far behind 9 agree Reply Wow! I sometimes forget how lucky we are here in Massachusetts where gay marriage has been legal for over 5 years. 6 agree Reply We are getting married in a primarily gay town in Massachusetts. When we went to apply for our marriage license there were two other couples applying- and they were both lesbian. The marriage license was totally gender neutral. Our officiant is a lesbian and her partner might participate in our service. 2 agree Reply Instead of a bouquet toss I am giving my aunts my bouquet in honor of their love and commitment to each other (over 10 yrs) with a tiny speech (if I'm not crying). 9 agree Reply In addition to the Freedom to Marry gift registry, we're planning to do our government marriage paperwork in an equality state, while having the big hoopla Jewish wedding in Pennsylvania. We only agreed to submit our engagement announcement to the local Jewish newspaper because it also runs announcements for same-sex couples. 2 agree Reply I'm all for marriage equality. While I'm currently in a heterosexual relationship, I identify as pansexual (and always have to explain what it means) and have been in relationships with women before. I have always been so thankful to live in Massachusetts and not have to worry about whether I'd be able to get married or not. I agree with the women who posted saying that something like this would hurt them. I can't help comparing it to food–I have family with Celiac disease, and I wouldn't stand up and eat a bowl of pasta and announce at the same time that it's awful that they can't do the same thing. I'd feel like I was rubbing it in their faces. I also feel like it's important to take guests into consideration. I don't know my boyfriend's extended family, but I do know that they're religious and I doubt they'll ever be aware of my orientation. I hope they wouldn't be upset if I *did* choose to give a nod to the couples who can't get married, but I wouldn't want to take that chance. A political message in a large group of people always has the potential to create drama, and I imagine I'd have a nervous breakdown if someone flipped because we had white knots on a table. I might have rainbows, though. Not in support of anything. Just because I like rainbows. 8 agree Reply My boyfriend and I are not officially engaged, but we have done a lot of wedding talk specifically for this reason. As many of you may know MN is currently in the process of working through a possible ban to gay marriage in our state constitution. If this goes through we have decided not to be legally married in MN. We will probably honeymoon in Vermont, and be legally married there. We've decided instead of gifts to ask for donations to either a marriage equality fund or the humane society, so that people have options. Instead of favors we will be donating to the 2 groups ourselves. I love the white knots, and will probably have them out at our wedding and most likely my groom will wear one in place of a boutonniere. We have also decided its important to us to use vendors who support marriage equality. 1 agrees Reply As an ordained minister, I've had the honor to do some wonderful weddings. As a lesbian, it hurts that I can't have myself what I can give to others. However, my most recent wedding was for a very good friend of mine (who incidentally was who introduced me to OBB) and I was able to put a piece in the opening homily about Marriage Equality. I used the reading listed in the post, as well as my own thoughts on the subject of straight people getting married legally. In summary, I said that Marriage Equality is about honoring the love that people have for each other, not about other's bigotry deciding who does or doesn't get married. As unfair as I think it is that I can't marry the woman I love (whenever I find her ;-D) I think it's equally unfair for the LGBT community to hold that against our allies. I personally welcome any acknowledgement that civil marriage is not yet equal, and that love prevails over all. 10 agree Reply At our Rabbi's suggestion, we're pouring some of our wine onto the ground for people who cannot marry. It's a more literal "pouring one out for the homies." 5 agree Reply I think it depends alot on the laws where you're getting married and the feelings of the specific LGBTQ people you are intending to honour/acknowledge, especially if they are close to you. Personally, my girl and I are travelling from Aus to the UK to have a Civil Partnership – but I don't begrudge my hetero friends getting hitched in Aus. It's not their fault Australia is backward, and it doesn't help me if they remain unwed. However I can sympathise with those who say that it may feel patronising – which is why I think it depends totally on how it is done and to what extent. While a big song and dance would seem hypocritical, maybe a simple acknowledgement that heterosexuals are lucky to enjoy a basic human righ still denied to others would be enough. In australia, that basic acknowledgement is still something sorely lacking. 2 agree Reply as another lesbian with mixed feelings about heterosexual people's gestures towards marriage equality, I gotta say that the only thing that strikes me as absurd on this list is the suggestion of rainbow colors as a secret shout-out. Ally or not, it doesn't make sense for you to use my pride symbol as a decoration. It just seems appropriative, and almost as messed up as a white bride with no connection to India walking down the aisle in a sari because she thought it was pretty. 9 agree Reply I wonder why you feel that the use of rainbow colours would be 'absurd'? On one level, I can see that the idea of a "secret shout-out" could seem a little defeatist- if you want to show support for same-sex marriages, why would you not do so openly- what do you achieve by being so covert? On the other hand, I have some sympathy for those who do not want their wedding to become a political platform. For those brides who are concerned about conservative relatives being upset (whatever you may feel about such a response), use of something subtle such as the rainbow colours may be appropriate in revealing the sympathies of the couple in a very non-confrontational way. What I find a litle more strange is that you don't think people should use rainbows, "[your] pride symbol", for decorative purposes. You don't think people should use rainbows because it has a symbolic meaning for some people that they may be aware/ fully supportive of? You think a bride should not be allowed to wear an item of clothing traditionally associated with another culture, even if she likes it? Now, if someone wanted to decorate everything with swastikas just because they thought it was pretty, that might be a different matter, due to the hugely negative weight of its symbolism. However, rainbows have only fairly recently been reclaimed as a symbol of lgbtq diversity and equality, and is in no way "copywritten" to the movement. Rainbows could be a symbol of God's promise, as in from the Noah's ark story, I think they have been used for racial equality as well, there must be many other possible meanings, and I think most of them are positive. Even swastikas are derived from an ancient Hindu symbol for peace (one goes clockwise, the other anti-clockwise), so we cannot be so quick to judge. You also associate certain cultural meanings with a sari, and I'm sure most people would understand that it is traditional Indian dress, but if someone from another race wanted to wear one, so long as it was done in a respectful context, surely it is really a sort of compliment? I feel that, similarly with rainbows, which are not even so set as a defined 'symbol' (it's a naturally occurring colour scheme, after all…), if someone would like to use them just because they are pretty… well, that's fine! If they want to use them knowing the potential symbolic meaning, and they intend it to carry such symbolic force, I'm tempted to feel that that is also fine, so long as it is done with respect. Burning of rainbow flags just because it's pretty? Perhaps not so ok. But that's beside the point, I think. 10 agree Reply Bit of a late comment here but I can't help but agree about the use of rainbow colours being a bit of an ineffectual cop-out. I don't feel as though it's messed up, and personally have no problem with people choosing those colours – whether it's because they think they're pretty or to honour their non-straight friends. But unless it's actively stated that you've chosen these colours for a specific reason, nobody's going to know that's what they're about. Plenty of couples have chosen rainbow themes without any thought about their "gay connotations", and I wouldn't expect people to just assume. To me, chucking rainbows into the mix for this purpose – without any other context or show of support – feels slightly gimmicky, although I understand this to be a purely individual opinion. I'm still torn on this whole topic myself: I feel like I would be "buying' into an intrinsically patriarchal and hetero-friendly system by getting married, and am much more comfortable about choosing an option available to everyone. Then again, I am aware that choosing not to get married probably isn't making any difference, so it's a bit of a confusing thing for me. 2 agree Reply I know this was posted a long time ago, but I had to come back and share. I put a little comment on our very simple program saying that, on our wedidng day, our hearts went out to those who couldnt celebrate their love the way we are today, and hoping that the day would soon come that they can. My parents were pretty nervous about me doing that, since it was a full mass Catholic ceremony where I was handing these programs out, but I had at least a couple comments about how much people appreciated that little shout-out. And everyone had to read it, since it was in the midst of our note to our guests, but it wasn't us trying to force it down their throats. Hopefully it did some good. 2 agree Reply signing letters to legislators in support of marriage equality would be ideal! 2 agree Reply For our wedding, my FH and I plan on having a handfasting. We're Unitarian Universalist and I am very proud of my Scottish Druid roots. Mostly I love that handfastings are all-inclusive, allowing gay marriage as well as polyamorous marriage. I feel it's a good way to get married in a way that aligns with our beliefs, feels comfortable to us and isn't rubbing anything in anyone's face. His family is very religious so we don't want to offend, but I feel it's a wonderful way to be inclusive and subtle. 1 agrees Reply Thank you so much for the info! Since 3 of our wedding party members are LGBT, we want to honor them as much as possible and stand as a symbol of understanding until they are granted the same rights as we have. I am definitely doing a White Knot table. Solid ideas, thank you. Reply What an interesting and important conversation. In light of some of these comments, I think I'll have a frank talk with my gay male friend about whether or not he'd find an acknowledgement of marriage equality patronizing or desirable. Reply I can see a lot of the points on this page. My favorite thing I've read here is to simply not support the non supporting state. I currently live in a state that does allow same sex marriage but come from a state that still does not recognize it. I have felt for years that I didn't want to marry until my sister would be able to. However once my beau popped the question, I want to do it for us. I'm planning on having the ceremony (outdoors) where I'm from- but we will be licensed in our current supporting state. Reply We are using the following as part of our wine ceremony, borrowed from the tradition at the Passover seder of spilling out some wine (by dipping your finger, not actually spilling– better for fancy clothes!) in recognition of the ten plagues brought upon the Egyptians. : "Before drinking from this cup of joy today, Bride and Groom also acknowledge that their cup is not quite full. They will spill out drops of wine in the hope that someday all sacred unions will be fully recognized as legal marriages by the civil authorities, with all of the rights and benefits of marriage, and none of the discrimination that faces many committed partnerships including same sex couples today. Special days like this belong to two people who love each other â€“ irrespective of religion, race, gender or sexuality." 1 agrees Reply I've really struggled with this. I think I'm not going to get married because of it and just have my own personalised ceremony. It will have none of the legal stuff but I don't really care, we're already committed to each other anyway. I know it will offend some conservative people and probably come across as preachy and judgemental of people who decided to get married. It will also probably not do a lot to change the laws. However, weddings (or in this case, a commitment ceremony?) will never please everyone and it's not about them anyway. It's about my partner and I and personally, with no judgement of others, I don't think I can participate in an institution which so openly perpetuates discrimination. Reply Join the conversation Cancel Reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Participate in this conversation via emailGet only replies to your comment, the best of the rest, as well as a daily recap of all comments on this post. No more than a few emails daily, which you can reply to/unsubscribe from directly from your inbox. No-drama comment policy Part of what makes the Offbeat Empire different is our commitment to civil, constructive commenting. Make sure you're familiar with our no-drama comment policy. Biz owners & wedding bloggers Please just use your real name in your comment, not your business name or blog title. Our comments are not the place to pimp your website. If you want to promote your stuff on Offbeat Bride, join us as an advertiser instead.