OH NOES! iPods might put overpriced wedding DJs out of business? Say it ain't so!
|
|
||||
Announcing the birth of our sister site: Offbeat Mama! 
Love this post?
|
Most Recent Comments |
Copyright © 2003-2009 Ariel Meadow Stallings. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction in part or in whole is prohibited.
Header illustrations by ButterfliesKiss.com. Silk icons by famfamfam.com. Social media icons by Paul Robert Lloyd.
Comments on "The DJ vs. the iPod"
2 responses to this entry · Leave a comment · Comments feed (RSS 2.0)
Sbmaya
April 12th, 2007 · 5:31 PM · #
Hey now! Gotta stick up for the DJ's…(married to one after all) ….Here's the deal, in a few words:
If you care about having people dance (more than a few songs) at your wedding:
Get a band or a DJ
If not, you can do the iPod thing…but it can be a lot more work than you realize, depending on the size of the venue.
Ariel
April 13th, 2007 · 7:37 AM · #
Yeah, I have to say that I loooved having DJs at our wedding, but we're aging ravers and dancing was really REALLY important to us. For folks who aren't as dance-obsessed, an iPod can work fine for background music. Just make sure you bring a backup iPod in the case of technical issues, which always seem to happen.